Six good men running for 26th
District State Rep
Madison Heights and
Royal Oak voters can't go wrong
choosing any one of the six candidates hoping to be their State
Representative.Speaking style aside, the
four Democrats and two Republicans who participated in Thursday's
League of Women
Voters Candidate Forum at the Royal Oak
Library are (a) equally impressive in terms of familiarity with state
issues and (b) not far apart in philosophical approach to most of those
issues. The Democrats are Frank Houston, Bob Klotz, Kevin McLogan,
Jim Townsend. The Republicans are Ken Rosen and Bill Shaw.
The auditorium was filled, probably more than a hundred in attendance.
Here is a flow-of-conversation summary of that 90-minute forum.
- Five of the six maintain
this is not the right time to hold a state constitutional
convention. Houston said necessary amendments can be
presented to the electorate without spending the $20-30 million
needed to go through the convention process, and "Will the voters
ratify?" Shaw voted Yes, his thought being that
substantive changes are needed to get the state out of its
bureaucratic "quagmire." Townsend said regional collaboration
can accomplish much of any reform needed. Rosen stressed that
"we can reform government with our votes," pointing our that there
are many open seats in the legislature and other elective posts.
- Five of the six
said, "yes, yes, yes" about supporting the three millage
proposals on the August 3 ballot. Rosen: "But no new
taxes. Is the money being well spent? Shaw said that
unfortunately, the problem "won't be solved in Lansing," apparently
agreeing that regional collaboration may be t he way to address such
matters.
- Maintain Public
Benefits for that "one-quarter of Michigan's population that
currently requires them? Klotz and McLogan, both
emphasizing mental health as well as Medicare and Medicaid, agree
the safety net must be maintained. Townsend says maintain it,
but reprioritize the spending. Rosen thinks a safety net is
essential but should not be a "butterfly net," from which there is
no escape. He offers that non-profit groups are more effect than
government in rendering such services. Shaw: "This is a
conundrum." If the choice is between using government's "limited
resources" to help create jobs or to provide these services . . .
- Stopping home
foreclosures? McLogan: All those "foreclosed" houses are
not on the market. Communities should cooperate in addressing the
problem regionally. Townsend: People lose homes when
they have no jobs. Work across community lines to create jobs.
Rosen: Put people to work. Get government out of the way. Shaw:
The answer will not come from Lansing. Madison Heights and Royal Oak
must address the problems of their empty houses. Houston.
Don't blame only those who unwisely bought home beyond their means.
Address the fact that "predators" were part of the problem. Klotz:
"Are people getting what they deserve?"
- Immigration?
Townsend: We need to be welcoming and open. Rosen: It's
not that hard for employers to verify a worker's status about
everything from driver's license to citizenship. Shaw: This
is a no-brainer. Don't break the law. "I'm a believer in States'
rights, and the Feds are not living up to their responsibilities."
Houston: Uphold the laws. Klotz: There's a difference
between discrimination and prejudice. Hire Michigan first.
McLogan: Employers simply make routine checks. Go after
employers who take advantage of the immigrant situation.
- Unfunded
mandates from Lansing? Rosen: "Irresponsible." Government
should work from the bottom, up. Unfunded mandates are government
from the top, down. Shaw: Demand that no legislation be
passed without, first, determining the cost of implementing that
legislation and, second, identifying the source of funding.
Houston: Some of these come from the Feds, not from the State.
Citizens have to determine what kind of Michigan we want. Klotz:
"Ridiculous." McLogan: Feds pass a lot of unfunded mandates
to the states. Townsend: It is the job of each State Rep to
fight unfunded mandates. We'll have to make tough choices.
- Cost-savings by
community collaboration: Shaw: Lansing has laws which
discourage collaboration. Amend or repeal those laws. Houston:
The State needs to participate, to encourage. Klotz:
Collaboration can be done, but too often "pride or empire" gets in
the way. It's been done in schools, although it may take a couple of
graduating classes before it become accepted. McLogan:
Government can learn from schools. Townsend: Reward
communities for working together. Rosen: Try everything. Keep
an open mind -- but "let's not create new bureaucracies to eliminate
bureaucracy."
- Use a Credit Score
to establish rates for home or car insurance? Houston:
This was a bad decision from the State Supreme Court. Klotz:
Unfair. Correlation is not cause-and-effect. McLogan: It's
hard to conceive of a correlation between driving skill and credit
rating. Townsend: Unfortunately, the Court's decision will
preempt any proposed legislation to change the situation. Rosen:
Not fair, but the Supreme Court rules. Let's open up to other
insurance companies. Shaw: Fairness? Track down who in
Lansing gets Insurance Money.
- Tax Professional
Services? Klotz: No. the need is to reduce taxes.
McLogan: That approach to taxing was unfair. Townsend: We
need tax reform, to lighten the burden on business. A progressive
income tax would help accomplish reform. Rosen: No new taxes
-- at this time. Shaw: I've read that the tax on tanning spas
has been declared discriminatory because it is a "tax on
Caucasians." Houston: This came out at the eleventh hour,
reflecting anti-business attitudes.
- Another, publicly funded,
Bridge to Canada? McLogan: Yes, but Windsor might suffer
from a traffic overload. Townsend: Yes, especially since
Canada will pay most of the cost. Rosen: A second bridge,
yes, but not publicly funded. If Canada puts up most of the money,
they'd want most of the control. Shaw: What has this to do
with Madison Heights and Royal Oak? Houston: I prefer going
with public funding. Klotz: This would be an unfunded
mandate.
- Incarceration
versus Education? Townsend: Reform sentencing guidelines
to help reduce our prison system costs. Rosen: The issue
isn't incarceration versus education. Education will reduce
incarceration. Find out why Michigan's prison system is more costly
than that of other states. Shaw: Officers in the prison
system want Act 312 coverage which applies to Police and Fire. Watch
costs grow. Houston: We have to wonder why the Department of
Corrections has grown at the same time as most other departments
have downsized. Klotz: Probation works. Use probation as one
tool to reduce incarceration costs. McLogan: Review the
wisdom of mandatory minimums. Most people in prison will be coming
out. Educate them.
Based on their performance at this LWV forum,
all of the candidates would fall between
Center-Left and Center-Right on VersagiVoice's
Left-to-Right tabulation,
a performance which will please many but certainly
|
What the
voters wanted to hear about
Do we need a Constitutional Convention?
Three Millage Proposals
One-fourth of Michigan residents getting Public Benefits
Protection against Home Foreclosures
Dealing
with Immigration problems
Dealing with Unfunded Mandates
Is
Lansing blocking cost-savings from collaboration between cities?
Re
Supreme Court decision upholding use of credit rating to establish
insurance rates
Taxing services, specifically professional services
Publicly
funded or private 2nd bridge to Canada?
Spending more on prisons than on schools
Also see
2010 Primary Page
|