|
||
|
Democracy in America,
by Alexis De Tocqueville
The Content of Our Characterby Shelby Steele A professor of English at a long-integrated college, Steele in 1990 wrote:
That kind of thinking has caused some blacks to consider Steele an Oreo, a traitor to his race. At the same time, Steele reports being called "nigger" by whites "every six months or so." Married to a white psychologist, he tends to smother his racial insights in psychological jargon, but his several messages come through. Rather than my telling you what Steele says, I've selected the following passages which capture both the substance and tone of his book.
Steel speaks of his youth and early life, and he describe experiences with discrimination and hate which one encounters in the biography of any accomplished black (Colin Powell. for another example). It is on the college campus, though, and in his interactions in the predominantly white circles in which his life places him that Steel best captures the apparently unavoidable hurts and resentments of being black in America.
Ivanhoe, by Sir Walter Scott Scott is considered the writer who invented the historical novel. In Ivanhoe, for example, he brings together such different personalities as Richard Lion-Heart and Robin Hood. Even while he repeatedly suggests massive corruption and hypocrisy in the Catholic Church, he does an excellent job of depicting social life of and the interactions among nobles, serfs, slaves, church, kings, military/religious orders like the Templars, Jews. The Crusades were underway at the time, so the fight against Muslims is part of the background. And, writing in the late 1700s, early 1800s, he was certainly among the first to coin what we would now call psychological phrases as he justified or condemned the behavior of his heroes and villains. No cardboard characters here. Such characters as Ivanhoe, his love Rowena, the lovely "Jewess" Rebecca, her father Isaac, all display both admirable and censurable qualities. My Ivanhoe is a fragile hardbound 4 by 6 "pocket book" published in 1907. To enjoy the novel for the first or second time, pick up a paperback or borrow it from the Library. You'll experience several delightful hours. --- FJV: Nov 2005 The High Cost of Peace, by Yossef Bodansky Bodansky charges most U.S. statesmen and presidents, especially Clinton, and every peacenik in Israel as being blind to the significance of each speech, trip, exchange of correspondence, telephone call, meeting, casual conversation to which he refers, in an unsuccessful effort to make his point by drowning the reader in, interpreted, details. Manifesting what I call a UFO mindset -- everything that happens or doesn't happen confirms one's preconception -- the author concludes that "Washington's Middle East policy left America vulnerable to terrorism." Even though the author is less than careful, perhaps even less than truthful, when he equates events which shouldn't be equated, several useful bits of information emerge:
One comes away from this book weary and impatient with both the Israelis and
the Palestinians, wondering whether the U.S. shouldn't let these mutually hating
populations have at each other without providing aid to anyone in the Middle
East -- letting borders be set as they have been throughout history, by
force. The Sunday Philosophy Club, by Alexander McCall Smith Disappointing because the plot is thin and the characters sketchy. Isabel, the protagonist, is a 40-year-old female busybody who can't keep her nose out of the affairs of others. Although we watch her daily routine and learn a bit about her day job, she never becomes a substantial presence. The descriptions of locale are brief like those of Agatha Christie, yet far short of matching Christie's solidity. Delightful because the author's gentle/never vigorous writing style seems perfectly appropriate to move the sketchy characters along the thin plot's development, maintaining just enough interest in the solution of a possible crime to keep one reading. The conversation is simple, with only the occasional British allusion which proves confusing for an American. Delightful, too, because although the philosophy club in the book's title never meets, the author uses the thin plot and gentle dialogue as his way to illustrate his own philosophy about love, lying, living, self-awareness, whatever. The book's jacket states that Smith is a best-selling author of novels featuring a Ladies' Detective Agency and that this book is the first in a new series featuring "the irrepressibly curious Isabel Dalhousie." Read this book if someone gives or lends it to you or if it goes on sale. A Jacque Barzun Reader, edited by Michael Murray Barzun is an irritatingly brilliant intellectual who likes words for their own sake, so a reader often has to wade through an ocean of words before encountering an actual thought, concept, idea. Yet, Barzun charges other writers with "literary conceit" when he counters their too-frequent condescension toward almost everyone who isn't a writer or artist with something like, "It is old women, not Grecian urns, that have in their time borne Keatses and Faulkners." When he deals with political theory, Barzun is more readily understood. When he questions, for example, whether democracy is really exportable, his thought processes are not lost in a flow of words-for-words sake. Concerning youth in general, he makes the common charge that the young are rebels without a cause, that "the aggressive impulse of youth is against things as they are." From his essay on art: "My judgment will be a good deal less wholesale that those of critics who find nothing but solace or menace in science, bureaucracy, or religion in the lump." Barzun disparages Shakespeare by offering historic evidence that the Bard was not thought highly of in his own time and for 150 years after his death. Then, Barzun contends, "the Romantics invented" the Shakespeare who is today so admired. Coincidentally, The Economist, of London, recently published an essay suggesting that Shakespeare became popular only after French Revolutionists romanticized him. Place this book at the end of one of your bookshelves, to pick up now and
then, flip open, and read at random. Right Turns, by Michael Medved And reading this excessively self-absorbed writing, even for an autobiography, makes it easy to understand that intensity. Intellectually brilliant and manically hyperactive in his youth, early years, and even in midlife, he strikes me as being only one impulsive decision away from converting to agnosticism or Buddhism, depending on what he had for breakfast. Chapter after chapter Medved drowns the reader in personal trivia as he tries to link every one of his intellectual moves, from political left to political right, to real-world events in his family, business, political, or religious life. A bit too quick with witty and negative characterizations of almost everybody -- John Kerry, Bill & Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy -- Medved becomes overly defensive when he is the target of similar characterizations. Through it all, though, he makes it easy to track his journey from left to right as he describes his experiences in political campaigns for Democrats and Republicans . . . his defense of Mel Gibson and Gibson's Passion of The Christ movie against Medved's fellow Jews . . . how drive-alongs with police convinced him that cops know more about the real-world than professors . . . how illogical it is to denigrate the military which defends the protesters' freedoms . . . why a more Christian America is good for Jews (a point also made by Senator Joe Lieberman on a recent TV talk show). Seldom have I been so repeatedly irritated then pleased as when Medved's excessive preening gives way to interesting information and conclusions. One bonus from sticking with it was a new insight into theology or tradition behind some of the practices of Orthodox Jewry. Throughout the entire book, though, Medved frenetically hops skips, and jumps
-- geographically, in his employment, in his personal/family life, and
intellectually. A tiring journey for the reader. Napoleon, by Paul Johnson Johnson refers to Napoleon's "legacy of evil" and to the emperor's holding together his empire by "ubiquitous terror." Johnson does not belittle Napoleon but neither does he lionize the emperor. Instead, the author illuminates the dark side of some of Napoleon's accomplishments: During several of his military victories and defeats, Napoleon looted, raped, massacred, wiped out entire villages in retaliation for the deeds of a few. Painters and sculptures, after the fact, camouflaged bitter defeats -- as in Egypt and Russia -- with heroic paintings and statues. Johnson compares intellectuals at the time who admired Napoleon to "George Bernard Shaw . . . falling for the Stalin image; Norman Mailer and others hero-worshiping Fidel Castro; and an entire generation, including many Frenchmen such as Jean-Paul Sartre, praising the Mao Zedong regime." Johnson is a great writer, and this biographical
sketch -- a fast read -- is enlighteningly informative. 100 Decisive Battles, from Ancient Times to
the Present, by Paul K. Davis
As an example, the Spanish Armada Importance: "Spanish defeat marked the beginning of the decline of the Spanish Empire and made England the world's preeminent naval power, allowing the English to begin colonizing North America." The author's explanatory text concludes that had the Spanish been able successfully to invade England, "the development of England as a world power would have been seriously postponed . . . Catholicism could have maintained its preeminence . . . Spanish power in North American may have proved almost limitless." About Desert Storm, Davis's conclusions include "huge military success with mixed or negative political results" . . . debates are still going on about whether the coalition should have gone onto Baghdad . . . Had the American-dominated coalition deposed Saddam and implemented some form of king-making, "long-standing fears of western imperialism would certainly have been quick to rise again." 100 Decisive Battles makes excellent bedside
reading. One can choose any battle in any order. The teaser, though,
is that reading about one battle causes the reader to move quickly to another
referenced fight. Jeanne d'Arc at Orleans, William of Orange at Hastings, George
Washington at Trenton, Rommel vs Eisenhower at Normandy. Encountering
intersecting religious and secular histories; meeting in diverse contexts many
major historical men and women produces exciting, yet quietly satisfying reading
experiences. A History of the Jews, by Paul Johnson Throughout, the author weaves together the secular, religious, and racial strands of Jewish experiences. His secular history includes examples of Jews perpetrating, as well as being victims of, massacres and terrorism. About religion, Johnson objectively (offensively, some will feel) reviews Jewish mysticism and ritual, ancient to modern. About race, he addresses the sometimes confused self-image of Jews and the alleged self-hatred of outstanding Jews like Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx. Pointing out that during Hitler's holocaust "not a single member" of any of the groups killing Jews died or was seriously harmed by the Jews being led to their death, Johnson struggled to explain that passivity by tying it to some Jews' religious belief that their entire history, including such horrors as the holocaust, is part of God's will. The author describes Jews as often being anti-establishment, any establishment, and states matter-of-factly that Jews were correctly identified as leaders in Russia's communist revolution, a fact which Hitler exploited in his campaigns against them. An excellent book. The Collected Works of C. S. Lewis Nevertheless, one can sample this book and learn: why Lewis considers Evolution a "great myth;" the interrelationships he sees among culture, society, and Christianity; what might be the moral significance of recognizing pain in animals; how and why he labels some religions "thick" and some "clear." Few will read this work in its entirely, but open the book anywhere, read a few pages, and your mind encounters something substantial, even if not always comprehensible. Still, Lewis's practicality shows in statements
like, "I can say a prayer while washing my teeth, but that does not mean I
should wash my teeth in church." Does American Need A Foreign Policy?, by Henry
Kissinger Pre-Iraq, Kissinger was commenting that "relations between North America and Europe are beset by controversy." He mentioned that during the Suez crisis the Eisenhower administration worked to defeat France's and England's and Israel's military attempt to recapture the Canal. He reminds us that France and Germany "greeted with misgivings" Kennedy's handling of the Berlin crisis. Kissinger's explanation: " . . . to be expected when nations which had dominated global affairs for three centuries found themselves largely dependent on decision made three thousand miles away in Washington." Calling on his own decades-long experience in diplomatic work, Kissinger brings the same historical perspective to his comments Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America. Well-indexed, "Foreign Policy" is a
good read, a sophisticated primer of sorts, for anyone interested in world
affairs and America's role in them. American Aurora, by Richard N. Rosenfeld The anti-Washington group belittled him personally and professionally and warned of impending tyranny under his direction. The anti-Franklin-Jefferson faction accused the two of being essentially in the pay of France. President John Adams's desire to build a navy was praised as properly defensive and attacked as giving France a reason to attack U.S. shipping. History-and-politics at the very personal level: American
Aurora is informative and interesting and occasionally exciting. Where the Right Went Wrong, by Patrick J.
Buchanan He suspects that "if the Iraqi insurgents and Islamic warriors are willing to die indefinitely to drive us out of that country and their world, the probability is that they will one day succeed." Of China, he says that country "is determined to become again the first power on earth" and that "her obsession is Taiwan." Of Latin America: "Mexicans are moving back into former Mexican territories in the American Southwest." About the global economy: Buchanan cites with praise, Theodore Roosevelt's "I thank God I am not a free trader." About the growth of government, he quotes a Congressman who worries, "How can a nation survive when a majority of its citizens, now dependent on government services, no longer have the incentive to restrain the growth of government?" Buchanan, a former presidential speech writer and founder of three famous talk shows -- The McLaughlin Group, The Capitol Gang, and Crossfire is an excellent writer, and this book is well-indexed, making it a valuable reference work for anyone concerned with social/economic/political affairs. But it helps to remember that Buchanan's jeremiad has been preceded by similar bleak outlooks during our Revolutionary War and Civil War. Just 18 months after the end of World War II, influential writers were declaring that the occupation had failed, that people throughout Europe hated the U.S. Remember, too, that the U.S. lived with years of insurgency in the Philippines, yet established democracy there and gave them their independence. France in Angola, Britain in India, Belgium and Germany in Africa: all lived with insurgency so long as they felt the toll was worth it. Britain stayed in India even after a mutiny by the Indian troops it had trained, granting independence only after Ghandi, who by the way could not bring himself to support Britain in its fight against the Axis. A good part of the delight of reading such books
as Where the Right Went Wrong is in putting what the author says in
historical, and current, context. Even liberals who hate conservatives will
enjoy and benefit from reading Buchanan's book. Betrayal, by Linda Chavez Once Upon a Town, by Bob Greene Greene visits North Platte, where the old
railroad station/canteen no longer exists, and recreates the Forties atmosphere,
physically, emotionally, mentally. He travels the country to interview volunteers,
mostly women, and veterans who fondly recall the 15-minute stops. Their memories
recall a unified nation fighting a different war at a different time. How To Talk To A Liberal (if you must), by
Ann Coulter Coulter chides those who would avoid all criticism of Max Cleland, who lost his limbs in Vietnam, for not acknowledging that the grenade explosion which injured Cleland came from an accidentally dropped grenade which was dropped, not in combat, but in a holding area where the troops were having a beer. The book is a compilation of her articles over several years, here grouped by topic, rather than chronologically. Even in her groupings, the chapter titles reflect Coulter's distain of the liberal mindset as she sees it:
Coulter comes up with memorable comments, like "Who would Jesus kill?" and "Liberals haven't the vaguest idea what Christianity is." and "Arab hijackers now eligible for pre-boarding." Importantly, she offers documentation for many of her controversial rebuttals to how the "liberal media" slants its reporting of domestic and international news. About reprinting some of her older columns, Coulter says, "Unlike liberals, who would rather have their old columns defending H Chi Minh just go away, I would prefer that my columns be more closely read." Overall, Coulter's writing style is a bit
rambling, reflecting her speaking style where her emphasis is more readily
determined by voice tone, loudness/softenss, and inflection. Agree or disagree, How
To Talk To A Liberal is an interesting book. The Warrior Queens, by Antonia Fraser Adopting a feminist mindset (reasonable, not
excessive) the author attempts to separate fact from myth. In so doing, she
provide excellent reading for both those who care about a feminist
interpretation of history and those who care about the history for its own sake.
Not an easy read, primarily because Fraser repeatedly alludes to earlier
pages, which makes it difficult to use the skim-and-select technique to identify
and really read only what matters to you. The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown For me, the book runs about 50 pages too long,
and the ending is -- probably unavoidably -- anti-climatic, but it is a
fun-read. To America, by Stephen E. Ambrose What brought me to this book was having read some
of Ambrose's outstanding works, like Undaunted Courage about the Lewis
& Clark expedition. He is a tight writer, creating memorable images from a
lot of details. So, despite the autobiographical spin of To America, one
encounters many informative items while he muses over topics as varied as the Battle
of New Orleans, the Transcontinental Railroad, General Custer, Women's Rights,
and American Racism. American Soldier, by General Tommy Franks His Prologue sets the tone by describing the teleconference during which President Bush ordered him to begin operations in Iraq. About 500 pages later, in an Epilogue which is titled "Creases in History, Franks offers up-to-the-minute-of-publication comments about everything from media reporting to Iraq's infrastructure and about everybody from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld through CIA Chief Tenet to Secretary of State Powell. Among the points General Franks make in his Epilogue:
In the 500 pages between his prologue and
epilogue, General Franks -- in almost autobiographical format --
takes us through civilian-political-military discourse and experiences from
Korea, Vietnam, the first Gulf War, Somalia. He touches on the pluses and
minuses, as he sees them, of reorganization at the Pentagon, the nation's and
international intelligence performance, and his on-the-ground experience with
the entire Weapons of Mass Destruction imbroglio. Franks says it was at his
request that President Bush made the shipboard proclamation about the end of
major combat. The general felt that something should be done to praise and
honor American troops, especially since the United Kingdom held a parade for its
military returning from Iraq. A National Party No More, by Senator Zell
Miller Actually written in 2002, more than a year before
the Republican Convention, the book calmly point-by-point presents Zell's mental
journey to that angry speech. A combination of autobiography and of evolving political
beliefs, A National Party No More, provides readers with interesting and
informative context, not only for this election but for monitoring future
political developments Lincoln The Unknown, by Dale Carnegie February
is Black History Month:
|
4 books dealing with Black History Shelby Steele: American Soldier, by General Tommy Franks A National Party No More, by Senator Zell Miller, The conscience of a conservative Democrat Lincoln The Unknown, by Dale Carnegie 4 Readings during Black History Month To America, by Stephen E. Ambrose The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown The Warrior Queens, by Antonia Fraser Once Upon a Town, by Bob Greene How To Talk to a Liberal (if you must), by Ann Coulter Betrayal, by Linda Chavez Where the Right Went Wrong, by Patrick J. Buchanan The Skeptical Environmentalist, by Bjorn Lomborg American Aurora, by Richard N. Rosenfeld Does America Need A Foreign Policy?, by Henry Kissinger The Collected Works of C. S. Lewis A History of the Jews, by Paul Johnson 100 Decisive Battles, by Paul K. Davis Napoleon, by Paul Johnson Right Turns, by Michael Medved A Jacque Barzun Reader, edited by Michael Murray The Sunday Philosophy Club, by Alexander McCall Smith The Souls of Black Folk, by W.E.B.Du Bois Animal Farm, by George Orwell |
4 Readings during Black History Month 2006
In large part to participate intellectually in Black History Month 2006, I read or re-read four books dealing with racial problems. In chronological order of being written, the book are:
The Souls of Black Folk, by W.E.B. DuBois
The Autobiography of an Ex-Coloured Man, by James Weldon Johnson
the black man in search of power, by a news team from The Times (London)
The End of Racism, by Dinesh D'Souza
The first two books were written by American black men, the third by a 7-man British news team whose racial mix was not disclosed, the fourth by an American of Asian Indian descent.
|
The Souls of Black
Folk Du Bois (rhymes with "rejoice) reminds me of Carlyle's The French Revolution, in that Du Bois interweaves facts, interpretations, poetry, biblical citations, and classical allusions in an almost mystical style. He writes both objectively and subjectively, but it is easy to identify the mode of any paragraph or passage. Thus, he shows how the U.S. Government tried -- with its Freedmen's Bureau and working with as many as 50 charitable groups, but with no money -- to implement the promises of 40 acres and a mule and of education. He cites the efforts of New England school marms to set up 1-room school houses throughout the South. He even dares to describe the pluses as well as the minuses of slavery as practiced in the South, characterizing Southerners by both their praiseworthy and evil attitudes. The two lengthy extracts, below, capture his objective/subjective style. "Looking now at the county black population as a whole, it is fair to characterizes it as poor and ignorant. Perhaps ten per cent compose the well-to-do and the best of the laborers, while at least nine per cent are thoroughly lewd and vicious. The rest, over eighty per cent, are poor and ignorant, fairly honest and well meaning, plodding and to a degree shiftless, with some but not great sexual looseness. Such class lines are by no means fixed; they vary, one might almost say, with the price of cotton. The degree of ignorance cannot be easily expressed. We may say, for instance, that nearly two-thirds of them cannot read or write. This but partially expresses the fact. They are ignorant of the world about them, of modern economic organization, of the function of government, of individual worth and possibilities -- of nearly all those things which slavery in self-defense had to keep them from learning. Much that the white boy imbibes from his earliest social atmosphere forms the puzzling problems of the black boy's mature years. America is not another word for Opportunity to all her sons." "Free! The most piteous thing amid all the black ruin of war-time, amid the broken fortunes of the masters, the blighted hopes of mothers and maidens, and the fall of an empire, -- the most piteous thing amid all this was the black freedman who threw down his hoe because the world called him free. What did such a mockery of freedom mean? Not a cent of money, not an inch of land, not a mouthful of victuals, -- not even ownership of the rags on his back. Free! On Saturday, once or twice a month, the old master, before the war, used to dole out bacon and meal to his Negroes. And after the first flush of freedom wore off, and his true helplessness dawned on the freedman, he came back and picked up his hoe, and old master still doled out his bacon and meal." "Guerrilla raiding, the ever-present flickering after-flame of war, was spending its forces against the Negroes . . . " Du Bois speaks of "the other world" when attempting to describe how it feels "to be a problem." When approached by friendly whites with examples of "excellent colored men" they know or who want to point out that they fought for the North in the Civil War, the educated black must decide whether to smile, be interested, or "reduce the boiling to a simmer, as the occasion may require." It is a sensation of a "double consciousness" which gives the American Negro "two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder." That sense of two-ness was a major factor in Du Bois's rejection of what he termed the "narrow commercial" focus of Booker T. Washington. Du Bois characterizes Washington's encouragement for black to become successful workers in commerce and industry as "counsels of submission" which overlooked "elements of manhood." |
The Autobiography of
an Ex-Coloured Man Supposedly written by a musician/composer with an "Italian complexion," who in his childhood was told he was black, after living for years as a white, this "autobiography" is really a novel. The narrator much later in life decides to pass for white again, marries and has children whom he feels obligated to protect, as white, after his wife dies. Softly, with only a occasional touch of anger, he depicts the burden of being black, even a successful black -- after years of experiences, including black "low-life." The tone and substance of Autobiography are best captured with meaningful extracts written by a man who admits to having "natural and acquired Bohemian tastes." [Running home at age nine just after learning that he wasn't white and being assigned a "coloured" designation by a teacher] "Mother, mother, tell me, am I a nigger?" [Looking back on that day] "And so I have often lived through that hour, that day, that week, in which was wrought the miracle of my transition from one world into another; for I did indeed pass into another world. From that time I looked out through other eyes, my thoughts were coloured, my words dictated, my actions limited by one dominating, all-pervading idea [being coloured]." "When I learned that Alexandre Dumas was a coloured man, I re-read Monte Cristo and The Three Guardsmen with magnified pleasure." [After mentioning musical and literary accomplishments by "coloured people"] "In this measure, at least . . . all of the Indians between Alaska and Patagonia haven't done as much." [Ragtime music] "originated in the questionable resorts about Memphis and St. Louis by Negro-piano-players who knew no more of the theory of music than they did of the theory of the universe, but were guided by natural musical instinct and talent." [Describing white high society people who thought of him as white when he played piano in their gatherings] "These were people . . . who were ever expecting to find happiness in novelty, each day restlessly exploring and exhausting every resource in this great city which might possibly furnish a new sensation or awaken a fresh emotion . . . " "The French are more logical and freer from prejudices than the British . . .morality of the French . . . hypocrisy of the Anglo-Saxon." [Speaking of the differences between upper class coloured in the North and the South] "The difference was especially noticeable in their speech. There was none of that heavy-tongued enunciation which characterizes even the best-educated coloured people of the South." ". . . black men generally marry women fairer than themselves . . . dark women of stronger mental endowment are very often married to light-complexioned men." [Quoting a black doctor who was commenting on the best and worst of black behavior] "You see those lazy, loafing, good-for-nothing darkies; they're not worth digging graves for; yet they are the ones who create impressions of the race . . . because they are always in evidence on street corners, while the rest of us are hard at work." [After his white wife died (she knew of his background) and after he had lived "white" and decided he had to continue doing so to protect his children] "I have sold my birthright for a mess of pottage." |
the black man in
search of power The United Kingdom had race riots a decade before the United States; the major riot, in Nottingham, occurred in 1958. The U.S. riots were in 1967. As the writers deal with Britain's racial problems and use international references, they repeatedly focus attention on American racial history, sometimes citing commonalities and sometimes pointing out uniqueness -- as the following excerpts and comments demonstrate. Writing the year after the 1967 American riots: ". . . nervous white Americans have been making the same response as their ancestors made when they were faced by hostile Red Indians; they are reaching for their guns." Ghettoes are "politically controlled by the whites" . . . are the equivalent of Latin-American countries which are "colonies of the United States." Although "the Portuguese are colour-blind" and although there is "lack of colour prejudice within the Portuguese army . . . Angola and Mozambique [Portugal's African colonies] must be taken first." About any "sense of solidarity" among African nations: "This brotherhood, this instinctive identification, often degenerates into bloody strife." "One Negro family in four is headed by a woman -- evidence of the marital discord which constant unemployment, bad living conditions and financial trouble cause in the ghetto. Only 9 per cent of white families are headed by women." Over the centuries, "London's history shows hostility, sometimes resulting in riots," against Huguenots, Jewish refugees, the Irish. "Native British people at the bottom of the pile, fighting to scrape a living and provide a sometimes leaking roof over their heads, are inclined to resent the arrival of newcomers eager to share already meagre resources." Two thousand years ago, "the Romans found the Britons inherently inferior . . . utterly stupid and incapable of learning." After six Englishmen were stabbed by West Indian blacks, whites fought the police who were protecting the immigrants, the Ku Klux Klan got into the picture, the immigrants suspected government-appointed helpers were spies, even after the U.K. employed "whole-time coloured welfare officers." "In Britain there are black people who think in terms of actually carrying out violence as a protest, rather as Welsh extremists blow up reservoir pipelines carrying water to the thieving English." "The simple truth is that in Africa, America and Britain, black people are protesting against white privilege [and relating their protest to the thoughts of] "post-Marxist revolutionary ideology of the new dissenters who have Castro, Mao, Stokely Carmichael and Ché Guevera as their prophets." " . . . coloured teenagers are stopped and questioned, even searched, by police more frequently than most people would imagine." As has happened in the U.S., Britain's coloured people insisted on having police who look like them . . . The British police found it difficult to find qualified candidates . . . When they did, the coloured community said, "Man, that's selling out. When you join the cops, you think like them." Because Asians and well as blacks experience discrimination in the United Kingdom, diverse coloured groups have attempted to form "multi-racial organizations of of militant groups."
|
The End of Racism
by Dinesh D'Souza
1995
Animal Farm, by George Orwell
This may be the fourth time I have read Animal Farm; it was published in
1946. I pick up the 118-page novel of social/political comment when I need to
take a break from heavier reading. By now,
even those who have never read Orwell are familiar with phrases like, "All
animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others" and
"Four legs good, two legs bad."
The animals, led by the pigs, revolted, drove their human owner off the farm, and established their own society and government. The last of the Seven Commandments they adopted stated, "All animals are created equal."
As the months and years passed, all except the pigs were puzzled by changes in the rules, by unexplained happenings, by being told that all except the pigs were incorrectly remembering their early history. The pigs moved into the farm house, began to wear clothes -- violating the 3rd commandment; slept in beds (4th); drank alcohol (5th). A "traitor" was executed, violating the Sixth Commandment, "No animal shall kill any other animal." The pigs began to walk erect, and the new slogan became, "Four legs good, two legs better."
Memories and eyesight began failing as the animals aged, so the non-pigs -- watching a card game through the window --noticed without comment that after the head pig and a human had each played an ace of spades simultaneously a loud argument ensued, and the faces of the clothed and erect pigs changed so much that the non-pigs couldn't be sure which in the room were animals and which were human.
There, the book ends.