|
|
Normandy Oaks Dialogue: 2007 |
If the November ballot is to include a referendum about selling Normandy Oaks, the ballot should also include a proposed 4-year millage which will generate an amount equivalent to what would be realized if the golf course were sold. Voters will then have the choice of --
-- not selling Normandy Oaks . . . and approving a tax increase
-- selling Normandy Oaks . . . and rejecting the tax increase
The text above appears near the end of my report out of CITCOM's budget-focused work-study session on Saturday 03 February.
A look back
From the 1983-84 "Financial Picture"
"What has been done to cut costs?
"25% of full time positions have
been eliminated over the past four yeas (115 jobs). Departments have been
combined to reduce administrative costs. Work has been contracted out -- for
example, refuse collection, saving about $700,000 per year and janitorial
services, saving about $80,000 annually."
Barbara Hallman was mayor. Commissioners were Ken Culling, Phil Natke, Pat Paruch, Dave Richards, Linda Shadrick, Robert Stocker.
It's going to be a long, drawn-out
debate
Try as it might, the City Commission has found it impossible to convince the
green space lovers that the sale or not of Normandy Oaks Golf Course is not the
only issue in budget deliberations. Already, in large and and small personal and
civic gatherings, one hears the guesses: (a) the green space lovers will
overwhelmingly vote not to sell, or (b) the golfers and green space lovers are a
militant but small constituency.
I'll use this page to report developments and to publish ongoing comments -- of others and mine.. -- FJV
| Commissioner Miller keeps all options open At least one city commissioner is willing to insist that the elected body is derelict if it refuses to consider selling "city assets" as one of the options for turning Royal Oaks's financial situation around. Those who hope that selling Normandy Oaks is permanently off the table are sure to be disappointed. And, we can expect Miller to attempt to overcome reluctance to really study the DDA/City financial relationships, rather than to accept the Administration's strong opposition to doing more than taking a one-sided cursory look at those relationships.
A non-binding, advisory
referendum is useless. Question: If CITCOM already has the courage to override voters' preferences, why not declare its decision without waiting for a vote of the people? Certainly, by the time the budget-work is done -- come May or June -- our elected officials will know what should be done and, logically, shouldn't be unwisely swayed by the emotionalism of the debate. -- FJV: 10 Feb 07
Golf course sale
delay costs Royal Oak dearly
Andrzejak drops Normandy Oaks sale connection to
police staffing
Normandy Oaks won't go
away |
Available on or from this page
|