Why would anyone want to be a commissioner or mayor?
Talk about downtown Royal Oak with residents/voters and two matters will come to the fore no matter what else is being discussed: alcohol and retailing -- both in the context of "What good does it do the neighborhoods?"

About alcohol, many agree with my occasional suggestion that some city commissioners let their decisions be determined by their anti-alcohol mindset. Just as many disagree, maintaining that CITCOM is too lenient about licensing alcohol-serving establishments. Most of this group of residents prefer to say "bars" rather than "restaurants," and they are incensed at CITCOM's decision to permit alcohol sales at the city-owned golf courses.

About retailing, residents find it more difficult to confidently label this or that commissioner, because the situation involves so many overlapping factors, like sandwich signs, the DDA, parking availability, parking enforcement, police presence, foot traffic, permissible businesses and, yes, alcohol. In these cases, even experienced observers of civic and political affairs find it difficult to separate principled positions from self-interest when voters evaluate CITCOM's performance, individually and as an institution.

So it happens that last week's VersagiVoice comments about the changing tone of CITCOM meetings was characterized as "piling it on" by some and as "too soft" by others.

Why would anyone want to be a commissioner or mayor?

CITCOM is 'more capable than ever'

Thanks for allowing me to respond to your opinion that the CITCOM meetings’ tone and mood had changed for the worse. While I agree the meetings have changed, I believe the change is beneficial and will lead to significant improvements for Royal Oak.

Since I began attending CITCOM meetings several years ago, I have felt the discussions were much different than those observed at successful businesses. While the CITCOM meetings offered camaraderie, congeniality and hefty doses of corn pone, they were light on fact, analysis and perspective needed to make decisions that stand the test of time. Historically, the corn pone played well to the casual observers, but the decisions have led Royal Oak into a financial crisis with no solution in sight.

The composition of the CITCOM changed with the last election and it is more capable than ever. The CITCOM is attempting to address city issues in a more thorough business like manner than in the past. However, this legitimate examination of the issues is now being stymied by the City Manager’s inadequate preparation. This prevents productive discussion and delays progress on important matters. The natural reaction of some Commissioners is frustration and I suspect this is the source of what is being called a change in tone and mood. But just like those of us in the work force who have faced a change in management, the City Manager needs to adjust. If he does, it will allow the CITCOM to perform in a manner that will significantly benefit all of Royal Oak.

Frank, I also wanted point out that out that I am 25+ year Royal Oak resident and a graduate of Albion College. Professionally, I have served in senior level positions in the health insurance/managed care industry. Currently I serve as a Strategic Performance Manager for a multi-billion dollar insurer where I assist a variety of business units to achieve their goals. -- Geof Vasquez

_____

Also see: City Commissioner Gary Lelito comments on CITCOM's performance during his Conversation with VersagiVoice.

VersagiVoice headlines for CITCOM reports

Keeping in mind the difference between colleague and friend, one would have to characterize CITCOM as a collegial body. Even though one or two may dislike each other and those dislikes may show up occasionally in body language or in an outburst, the commissioners and the mayor most often adopt the appropriate institutional mindset when they sit at The Table. And it is that mindset which establishes the mood for the meeting on a given night.

VersagiVoice headlines attempt to capture that varying mood, and the consecutive headlines, below, range from neutral, through jocular, to praise for individual commissioners, to kudos or censure for the meeting as a whole. Worrisome is a noticeable change in tone from, say, December 2007 to the present. And it is about that that perceived change that Geof Vasquez, at left, disagrees.

The tone, the mood, of CITCOM meetings has changed -- May 2008

CITCOM meeting turns into Court TV

A busy CITCOM meeting

CITCOM turns petty

Our good guys are back: CITCOM gets it done

Disappointing CITCOM meeting: These guys are better than that

If CITCOM were a unionized entity

CITCOM at its best: This is how representative democracy should work -- Dec 2007

CITCOM's first 2008 meeting was business-like and cordial

CITCOM's last 2007 meeting: Christmas spirit prevailed

Another quiet and short CITCOM meeting

About that unseemly CITCOM duel

Long but productive CITCOM meeting

CITCOM  holds a non-meeting

It was a dark and stormy night

The best kind of CITCOM meeting

Two brave souls: Commissioners Drinkwine and Lelito vote no -- Aug 2007