|
Citizens
for Property Rights is a coalition of citizens
dedicated to the preservation of property rights, |
|
Lot
split Hearings not necessary
Addressing one proposed lot split, Cowan went on to assure the applicant that such hearings are simply routine and should pose no problem in her case. Months later, and only after lawyers became involved, the issue was resolved. Here’s what CPR has found out so far: There is no Royal Oak ordinance or requirement that hearings be held about lot splits, but Michigan law requires the governing body, in this case the City Commission, to make the final decision. Most other cities have the paid City Administration, operating with authority derived from zoning ordinances and the like, study the request and make recommendations for the governing body to accept or reject. So in Royal Oak “protocol” and personal preferences add an unnecessary procedure and delay — all so the elected officials can demonstrate how much they care about (some) residents.
|
Return
to CPR Home Page
Lot split hearings are not necessary "Demolition by neglect" doctrine
reduces property rights
CPR Quick Finder The
Bank Building at Fourth & Main Homeowners
are as much at risk as commercial property owners Citizens
for Property Rights organized
When the Barton Towers neighborhood was threatened with mandated historic
designation,. CPR's
dialogue with the City Commission Quoted without Comment Historical Groups
serving Royal Oak Historic District Study
Committee news Should the Water
Works Building be saved? Is it historical? Family forced to accept
"landmark" status [go]
Huntington Woods fights the historic
battle [go]
Philadelphia Story: City Hall and Historical Commission
at odds [go]
Chopping
down the Bank's Pillars Historical Society of
Michigan meets in Port Huron [go] When 200
Preservationists gather [go] Holy Family in
Prison? |
|||