|
||
|
Royal Oak School District website Schools of Choice in Great Britain School vouchers found illegal in Florida Study suggests caring parents make no difference Is $10,000 per student enough? Education money belongs to the student 40 states have charter schools Impact of school closings on real estate values In Education Folder Comments on Education around the world VersagiVoice essays re education
|
§ Sweden and the Netherlands provide school choice, public or private. The Netherlands allow public money to be used for education in religious schools.
§ I'm not sure this falls under "Education," because it deals with greed and selfishness in an arena other than Wall Street.
Despite increasing taxpayer furor and resentment over the high cost of benefits in the public sector, the Michigan Education Association is calling for paying 33% more to teachers with at least 10 years service to retire early -- or something like that. One opponent writes, "The state's largest school employee union would maintain its membership through hiring young replacement teachers, collect dues from them and force them to become new customers for MESSA, the MEA-owned insurance carrier that makes millions of dollars for the teachers union each year." MEA President Iris Walters is quoted as saying, "Everyone in Michigan is making sacrifices."
Mandatory
pre-school?
Controversy over performance aside, public schools have long been
considered suspect by libertarians, some of whom point out, correctly,
that government-forced schooling is socialistic and dictatorial. (How
many other situations other than prison are there where an individual is
forced to spend specified time in a specified facility and forced to
absorb specified information whose content is determined solely by
government?)
Now come Obama and the Democrats with a plan to expand government-funded preschool. "Studies," most of them funded or conducted by education community, seem to conclude that attending preschool slightly benefits disadvantaged children and, to a lesser degree, other youngsters. As has been found about other early efforts, like Head Start and TV entertainment-focused education, even that slight benefit seems to wear off after third grade.
Then there is the consideration that families with both parents working benefit from access to preschool.
So why would even libertarians have reservations? Well, because -- given the government-knows-best mindset of the incoming administration -- the next step will be that government-funded preschool will be made mandatory. Stay-at-home mothers would be forced to send their kids to school to learn to "socialize," to interact with other children and with adults. (If they stay home with mom, you see, they never visit or are visited by family or friends.)
En garde!
=====
"There is respect for our religion
here," said Nadia Qualane, 14, her hair covered by a black
headscarf. The religion is Islam. The "here" is a Catholic school in
France.
Despite its historically fierce determination to
remain secular in all things, and withdrawing all financial support
or even recognition of anything religious, that country has found it
helpful to pay teachers' salaries and a per student subsidy to
Catholic schools which teach the "national curriculum" and and
are open to students of all faiths. That curriculum bans any
religious instruction "beyond general examination of religious
tenets and faiths as it occurs in history lessons." Religious
instruction, such as Catholic catechism, is "strictly voluntary." --
International Herald Tribune
An example of the concept that education funds
should follow the student In New York City the
school chief has suggested "charterizing" the entire school system. In
Harlem, 3,600 applied for 600 spaces available in charter schools. One
reason, according to a report in The Economist: "Tests taken at the
beginning of 2006-07 school year at Harlem Success showed only 11% of
six-year-olds were at their grade level in mathematics. By the end of the
school year, 86% were. This may have something to do with grouping children
by ability rather than by age . . . " -- 09 Jul 08
Vouchers in Denmark
The U.S. is not alone That money is not the answer is suggested by
the fact that per capita expenditures tends to be lower in countries whose
education systems perform well (Canada, Finland, Japan, Singapore, South
Korea). The study rather despairingly mentions hours, length of the school
day, and length of the school year as factors about which there is
uncertainty about their relationship to student performance.
Experimenting with modifying or supplementing public schools
continues.
In Chicago, for example, a group of business leaders dubbed
"education entrepreneurs" are funding a "Renaissance 2010" program.
The guidelines permit them to establish charter schools with longer
days, their own salary structure, unionized or not, so long as they
meet standards. The schools receive funding on a per pupil basis and
can raise private funds as well.
“In the United States, school vouchers are promoted by the
right as a way of undermining the public-school system; in Denmark,
state-financed private schools are accepted by the left as a safety
valve.” -- Foreign Affairs, Mar/Apr 2008
" . . . there had been (until recently) no measurable improvement in the
standards of literacy an numeracy in primary schools for 50 years." -- from
a report about the effectiveness, or not, of increased funding for education
in Great Britain. The report continues: "Australia has almost tripled
education spending per student since 1970. No improvement. American spending
has almost doubled since 1980 and class sizes are the lowest ever. Again,
nothing"
Do away with SAT?
Charles Murray, the same scholar who contends that not everyone can learn the
same academic subjects or occupational skills, now suggests that Scholastic
Aptitude Test scores no longer serve a useful purposes, that "high school
grade-point averages and subject achievement tests" are equal or better
predictors of a college freshman's performance. Murray maintains that the "vast
coaching industry" is rigged against disadvantaged students.
A Detroit
teacher replies to Newt Gingrich
Former U.S.
House Speaker Newt Gingrich has made headlines by sharply criticizing and
laying blame for the condition of Detroit Public Schools. Gingrich made his
initial comments during a TV interview then expanded on them in print. Royal
Oak resident Rob Duchene, who serves on Royal Oak's Historic District
Study Committee, is history teacher at King High School in Detroit, and he
provided the following paragraphs in response to
VersagiVoice's request for a reaction to Newt.
Newt offers the now familiar narrative of the decline of an industrial giant. The narrative is sad and poignant. However, Newt then subtly implies that the Detroit Public Schools are responsible for "fleeing populations, rising unemployment, declining wages" and so on. That a man who fancies himself a historian would resort to such outrageous simplification is telling. But as far as the bureaucracy is concerned, Mr. Gingrich has a point - DPS is over-administered.
But his list of the usual conservative remedies - charter schools, merit pay, coupons to allow students to attend parochial schools - tired and tried and found wanting. The remedy offered for merit pay shows Mr. Gingrich typically looking for thunder rather than lightning - if the "bureaucrats" are to blame for the mess, who did Newt think was going to be signing merit pay checks? And class size limits - everyone is in favor of that. But who will pay? No Child Left Behind punishes "failing" schools - no money there to limit class size.
Detroit's decline is the result of numerous social and economic forces that are actually global in size and effect. Newt seems to want to establish yet another GOP candidacy for President. If he is running on being an idea guy, this article reveals a long Georgia retirement in his future.
City Commission or School Board
Elected city
officials at least get measly compensation -- what? $20 a meeting for
commissioners, $30 for the mayor?
Invisible service goes
unrecognized
VersagiVoice has several times pointed out that a dedicated elected city
official -- commissioner or mayor -- spends 12 to 20 hours a week to
accomplish the position's responsibilities. They are seen at work by the few
residents who attend commission meetings and by the several hundred
residents who watch on cable TV. They are mostly not seen at
committee meetings, doing homework, serving constituents, visiting city hall
-- so such work goes unrecognized and unappreciated.
Elected School Board members work as hard and get no pay at all for:
Twice-a-month meetings, averaging 2-3 hours, with -- like the city commission -- an occasional 5-hour marathon.
As necessary to conduct/complete business, the Board may meet three times a month, but the extra meetings, usually dedicated to a limited agenda, don't last as long as regular meetings.
As happens at city hall, the school board conducts Saturday morning workshops to address budget or this or that specific issue.
Each board member attends at least one PTA meeting a month.
Each board member serves on at least two committees.
Optionally and not, board members attend out-of-district seminars sponsored by such organizations as the Michigan Association of School Boards.
In common, school board members, city commissioners, the mayor must perform much invisible service if they expect to be useful participants in the public deliberations.
In common, school board members, city commissioners, the mayor suffer criticism of their public decisions by residents who are not always informed about the detailed knowledge acquired through all that invisible service.
In common, school board members, city commissioners, the mayor are more-than-occasionally accused of being arrogant and power-mad when only a few of them are. The majority of these volunteers, paid and unpaid, simply want to serve their community by participating in those public arenas which matter to them.
A related thought.
Too many residents and voters go beyond disliking or distrusting individual elected officials and carry their distrust about government to an unreasonable suspicion that the school board or the city commission or -- in both cases - the administration is a conspiratorial and untrustworthy entity. I am reminded that during decades of collective bargaining work I encountered both management and union negotiators who considered the other side "the enemy." Those negotiators were so paranoid that they could not function reasonably in the stimulating but adversarial environment that is characteristic of collective bargaining.Even we libertarian-minded souls who prefer v-e-r-y limited government recognize the need for some government; therefore, we tend to tackle each issue on its merits, not on the basis of which individual or which governmental entity initiated or opposes the issue. -- FJV: 30 May 07
This tabulation is derived from a special edition of Your Schools, published by the Royal Oak School District.
|
The
tabulation -- *
Highlighted row is not in published table. That aside, some other highlights from the special newsletter:
September 2006 Breaking
the public school monopoly
School
choice expanding
"For Democrats who truly believe in social justice," WSJ comments, the choice is between forcing children to remain in schools where they have little prospect for a bright future, or enlisting private schools in a rescue mission." -- 13 Sep 06 In
MEAP results Into the late Seventies and early Eighties, there was still some sense that Berkley schools were superior and -- within Royal Oak itself -- that Dondero was academically inferior to Kimball. Those were impressions, one gathers, not measurements. Now come the 2006 MEAP scores, which show the Royal Oak School District outperforming Berkley, Clawson, Ferndale, and the Statewide public school averages in Math, Reading, Science, Social Studies, and Writing. See the news report in the 04 August 2006 issue of The Mirror for the scores.
Qualifying for Tenure in Royal Oak Schools
If the school
debate were on an Internet chat room If VersagiVoice were a chat room, there would be a v-e-r-y long "thread" of comments concerning school issues. Unfortunately such threads almost always contain anonymous personal attacks, and the tendency to nit-pick factual interpretations to death is apparently irresistible. The current school debate, though, can be narrowed to a few meaningful focal points. -- August 2006 About the timelines related to notification of closing Whittier and
passing the latest bond proposal:
About the duties and responsibilities of School Board Trustees:
Those who disagree vehemently with the decisions of individual city commissioners do not often attack the commissioners personally. About school trustees -- well about two or three of the current ones -- it is not rare to hear charges of arrogance and comments like, "They need to take some Dale Carnegie training." About the impact of school
closings on real estate values:
Did they or
didn't they do enough notification? One response to VersagiVoice's reporting re the LocoMoms campaign to assure one elementary school remains in South Central Royal Oak came from School Superintendent Tom Moline.
On the first page of five of the presentation to which Moline refers, Whittier is among the schools named to be closed; the last page includes the statement, "Flexibility must be maintained as this plan evolves through planning to implementation," but does not apply that asterisked notation to Whittier. [See]
Another
case for Education Vouchers
Readin', writin',
'rithmetic: Why they still matter For many years I participated in the screening and approval of applicants for apprenticeships as a pipefitter. In every batch of applicants, we could measure the unfortunate plight of individuals who had not learned the 3R's. Personnel tests I used for even a longer time showed the same results.
That's 'rithmetic. Let's move on to readin'. Because they can't read, they can't comprehend what is being asked of them in a word problem, even when they can do the math. Repeatedly I encounter people who can get a correct answer when a math problem is presented orally: "First, determine the area of the sheet. Then determine the area of each square. Then multiply the number of squares by the area of each square. Then subtract that total from the area of the whole sheet." As for wrtin': forget any essay question, even if all you ask for is a single 50- to 75-word paragraph. Some of these unfortunate souls, though, have been taught self-esteem.
Charter Schools,
anyone? That extract is from a Wall Street Journal editorial which criticizes Republican Governor of Connecticut, Jodi Rell, for opposing the attempt by the state's Democrat legislature to lift the enrollment cap and make funding more equitable ("charter students receive several thousand dollars less than what the state spends for non-charter students"). It's a good sign for charter school proponents that we have here a crossover of expected partisan politics. Well, partly, because the real issue seems to be Governor Rell's fear of alienating the Connecticut Education Association "which is dead set against charters and any other education reform that threatens its monopoly." Schools of Choice
in Great Britain At the same time, popular state schools are being encouraged to take over failing ones, and independent schools are being encouraged to federate with state schools. A bit leery, one spokesman for an independent consortium which already manages a number of state schools through a subsidiary charity warns, "The state has a habit of promising freedom and then not delivering it." Nov 2005 Making
Elections consistent and convenient for voters Consolidated election laws signed by the Governor over a year ago transferred authority to conduct school elections to the County Clerks beginning January 1, 2005. As a former State Representative, I know the intent of the law was to make elections consistent and convenient for voters with the goal of increasing participation. Elections will now only be allowed on four dates per year, on specific days in February, May, August and November, except in unusual cases which must meet certain criteria. Recent criticism of the Oakland County Clerk's office from Oakland Count Intermediate School District and a few local school officials is factually flawed. The new plan encourages voter participation, provides consistency, and eliminates government duplication. Elections will now be held on consistent dates in consistent places and in a consistent manner from year-to-year and from town-to-town throughout Oakland County. One goal is to stop "stealth" elections like the Oakland County ISD held on September 25, 2001. This never-ending property tax increase of over $60 million annually passed with less than 4% of the voters' approval. The school elections will not be as consistent and "voter friendly" as all other elections, including informing seniors by mail of their right to request an absentee ballot [see school bond] before every school election. Additionally, the practice of requiring the voters to go to different polling locations, for school elections, will be stopped. The new plan does away with voter confusion and makes the polling locations and the absentee ballots consistent. The new state law scheduled school elections on the same date as the November federal land state elections, thus increasing voter participation and saving schools the cost of conducting elections. However, the vast majority of schools in Oakland County recently chose a May election date. As a result, these schools will be responsible for the total expense of May elections. Recent comment from some school officials suggest they may be using education money to prepare for a legal challenge against this election reform. Their efforts are misguided and appear to be an attempt to continue to protect and control "stealth" elections, and our children lose. When the new legislation is fully implemented, the people's choice will be heard, our system of democracy improved, and accountability to the people improved, thanks to state legislation and the commitment of our local Clerks. Below, all from one publication, are samples of the many voices in education. This specific source is the Summer 2007 issue of Education Next, a publication whose mission statement reads:
From the Summer 2007 issue* Politics First, Students Last . . . A well-heeled commission issues a weak-kneed report . . . Still another education commission to tell us what to do about No Child Left Behind.
Adequately Fatigued . . . Court Rulings disappoint plaintiffs.
The Education Governor . . . An interview with Florida governor Jeb Bush
Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson . . . The Peyton Manning of charter schools
Pre-K10 . . . Who should control a four-year-old's education -- the government or parents?
The Lucy Calkins Project . . . Parsing a
self-proclaimed literacy guru
Civics Exam . . . Schools of choice boost civic values
|
Also see Schools of Choice in Great Britain Royal Oak School District website
School vouchers
found illegal in Florida Student
performance in schools -- That, at least, is one finding of a study in California which found that such factors as a rigorous curriculum and experienced teachers are much more important. This doesn't mean that parents aren't important, one researcher commented. Their impact does matter, but "other factors have a much greater impact on school performance." -- Dec 2005
Is $10,000
per student enough? On a roll, the court went on to suggest that the state's 43.million students would be better served by giving parents choice: "Public education could benefit from more competition." -- Jan 2006
|