|
Ongoing
developments about Drugs
All those Blacks in prison
Blame it on the War on Drugs
According to John McWhorter, lecturer in linguistics and
American Studies at Columbia University and himself a Black,
America's War on Drugs:
-
Destroys Black families
-
Discourages young Black men from seeking
legal employment
-
Makes spending time in prison a badge of
honor "In the 1920s, before the War on Drugs, Black
Americans, regardless of class level, did not view ex-cons as
heroes."
Get rid of the War on Drugs and you get:
-
No more gang wars over turf
-
No more shortage of [marriageable] Black men"
-
No more excuse for privileged Black men like
Henry Louis Gates to shout, "Why? Because I'm a Black man?" when
questioned by police.
-
No more hideous dropout rates among ghetto
teens.
McWhorter included these points in a talk before
the Cato Institute seminar in October 2010. Excerpts from his speech
were printed in the Winter Issue of the quarterly Cato's Letter
Certainly a message to consider in the ongoing
debate.
-- 22 Feb 2011.
Stupid War on Drugs
continues
UN tries to ban centuries-old practice
Andean Indians chew and brew tea with coca leaves. Because cocaine is extracted
from coca leaves, the United Nations wants to ban the centuries-old native
practice as part of its war on drugs. Let's see if the UN sends Blue Helmets to
arrest those millions of Andean druggies. --
Jan 2011
Mexico considersLegalizing Drugs
Within days of the report that Mexico
is thinking of legalizing drugs to change the nature of the war on drugs, comes
a report out of the United Kingdom that "Professor Sir Ian Gilmore said making
drugs such as heroin and cocaine legal would 'drastically' cut crime and
addicts' health problems." Further, he suggested that state-regulated use of
drugs would save money and avert the need to try to stop drug production in
countries such as Afghanistan.
-- 22 Aug 2010
Medical Marijuana
August 2010
►Unless unfavorable legal considerations
override sentiment, Royal Oak intends to make no accommodation for growing or
dispensing marijuana intended for medical use -- except , one hopes, for home-growing by
eligible patients. Certainly that is where the city stands now, a day
or two after the 09 August 2010 CITCOM meeting, where 35 Public Comment Royal
Oakers and out-of-towners made their pro and con pitches The city attorney has
been directed to prepare language concerning options to present at the 16 August meeting.
►It immediately became obvious that most of
those opposed to a proposed commercial growing-facility
are unable or unwilling to grant any special consideration for medical
marijuana. Pot is pot in their minds. That does not detract from the substance
of their concern: Marijuana is a gateway drug. . . . Its use, especially by
young people, often results in anti-social, even criminal, behavior. . . .Used
by adults, marijuana dulls the mind for everything from driving to data entry. .
. . The invited opening speaker cited his California experiences to paint a
picture of out-of-control pot dispensaries and
of street gangs. He cited sources who or which contend that no medical
benefits have been proved from the use of marijuana.
►Proponents of medical marijuana included
patients, caregivers, and a couple of individuals who are both patients and
caregivers. One woman calmly announced that she is in chronic pain and "I'm
dying." . . . They consider themselves living proof of the medical benefits. . .
. A major concern of the patients is that misinterpretation of Michigan's law
permitting medical marijuana will result in attempts to prohibit patients from
growing their own supply at home.
Many speakers and a couple of commissioners
said they voted for the Michigan law, which they considered a compassionate
compromise that would be implemented along the traditional
doctor-prescription-pharmacy path. They are uncomfortable with creating a
non-medical marijuana industry outside that path.
►Tangentially, there are those who see
economic benefits to Royal Oak in permitting growers and dispensaries. There
will be employment and more income for the city. . . . Not so, reply those who
say property taxes are paid even on unoccupied property, so there's no gain for
the city. . . . Actually, it was the petitioner's unsuccessful attempt to prove
hardship which caused the unanimous vote to deny his request. A second
petitioner will be offered a hearing at the September 20 CITCOM meeting. The
decision to grant the hearing came on 4-3 vote (Andrzejak, Semchena, Drinkwine
voting No), after City Attorney Dave Gillam stressed the "due process"
requirement in the moratorium.
The preceding paragraphs summarize what 35
speakers had to say, beginning with a petitioner's request to be exempted from
the city's Medical Marijuana Moratorium, to establish a marijuana-growing
facility in which several caregivers could grow enough plants to serve the
legally allowed number of card-carrying patients.
From the commissioners, the opposing
positions were well presented (but, unfortunately somewhat personalized) by Chuck
Semchena and Jim Rasor. Their polar positions became evident at the
very beginning of the CITCOM meeting, with the unattributed inclusion on the
agenda of a federal Drug Enforcement Agency representative who was granted, with
no time limit, the opportunity to present a talk titled "Rising crime rates and
Michigan's new Marijuana Law." It developed that Chuck had arranged the
presentation. Chuck explained that the DEA agent had spoken recently at some
conference on the topic. Rasor asked permission to introduce another speaker who
had also made a presentation at the conference. His request was denied, and his
speaker was granted an extra minute or two after his time-limited talk during
Public Comment.
Semchena's basic point is that, the actions
of 14 states to the contrary, medical marijuana is illegal under federal law. He opts for what
he calls the "Livonia Option," and he stresses that Royal Oak must act
before its moratorium expires at the end of October. Rasor maintains that
the Livonia Option seems to prohibit home-growing for medical purposes. He
suggests that if Royal Oak nullifies what is permitted by state law, "We
are going to be sued." Rasor is seen as pro medical
marijuana and has maintained that permitting and regulating legal businesses would benefit the
city economically. He smiled when one Public Comment speaker teased that Jim seems to have his own "stimulus
plan" to help the city's finances. In a more serious mode, Rasor snapped at
someone who attempted to interrupt his comments: "You've been talking for three
hours. It's our turn."
Somewhere in all this it was discussed whether the
Planning Commission should schedule another marijuana-focused hearing. I don't
recall that any decision was reached.
The vote to approve Semchena's request for
ordinance language which forbids any land use that is "illegal pursuant to
Federal, State, or Local law" was 6-1, Rasor voting No.
Oakland County's legal department
has made available to cities a 63-page report based on its research about
all this. The report lists three options for each city: (1) Adopt a
moratorium. (2) Regulate medical marijuana through zoning ordinances and
permits. (3) Attempt to ban medical marijuana to the extent possible.
(Birmingham and Bloomfield Hills have banned anything that violates federal
law. L. Brook Patterson favors a ban.
August 2010
Mexico looks at legalizing drugs
The question of whether legalizing drugs would help reduce the killings in
Mexico has made front page news this week and is causing unprecedented debate
around the world. Last week, former Mexican President Vicente Fox called on his
country "to legalize the production, distribution and sale of drugs" as the best
way to weaken the drug cartels.
Acknowledging that "radical prohibition strategies have never worked,"
Fox's recommendation
echoes another former president of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo, as well as past
presidents of Colombia and Brazil, who last year issued a
ringing condemnation
of the failed war on drugs, in favor of alternatives that include the removal of
legal penalties for marijuana possession.
This latest endorsement of legalization also comes on the heels of current
Mexican President Felipe Calderon's own announcement that, while he opposes
legalization, he nevertheless supports an open debate about ending prohibition
--
the root cause of the violence in Mexico that has now
claimed over 28,000 lives.
Sadly, however, legalization is not even part of the policy dialogue in D.C. In
fact, the U.S. drug czar has repeatedly said it's not even part of his or
President Obama's "vocabulary."
Yet despite Washington's reticence to engage the topic, the debate about
legalization is taking place in many communities throughout the U.S. California
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, like Calderon, has called for a debate about
marijuana legalization,
a proposal that
Californians will vote on in November. In 2009, the City
Council of El Paso, Texas -- directly across the border from Ciudad Juarez, the
world's deadliest city and ground zero in Mexico's drug war -- passed a
resolution "supporting an honest, open national debate on ending the prohibition
on narcotics." -- Huffington Post
Aug 2010
Drug Developments
►"Congress narrows
gap in cocaine sentences"
is the headline on a
report about a change in
a 25-year-old law that
permits longer sentences
for using crack cocaine
(mostly Blacks)
than for using the
powder form of the drug
(mostly Whites).
The new legislation is
on its way to the
President for his
signature. [See
Legalize Drugs]
►Pontiac's Silverdome
may be the venue for a
medical marijuana
convention,
sponsored by a
California company,
Medical Marijuana, Inc.
The event, the "1st
International Convention
& Halloween Harmony and
Harvest Fest," is
scheduled for October
29-31. City and county
officials are uneasy
that Pontiac might
become branded as the
marijuana capital, and
there is concern about
the behavior of the
crowd which gathers in
the Silverdome. Police
express a willingness to
insert undercover agents
to watch for the
illegal possession or
selling of drugs or of
drug paraphernalia. [See
Legalize Drugs]
VA
to allow medical marijuana
DENVER — The
Department of Veterans
Affairs will formally allow patients treated at its
hospitals
and clinics to use medical
marijuana
in states where it is legal, a policy clarification that veterans have sought
for several years. A department directive, expected to take effect next week,
resolves the conflict in veterans facilities between federal law, which outlaws
marijuana, and the
14 states that allow
medicinal use of the drug, effectively deferring to the
states.
The policy will not permit department doctors to prescribe
marijuana. But it will address the concern of many patients who use the drug
that they could lose access to their prescription pain medication if caught.
Under department rules, veterans can be denied
pain medications if they are found to be using illegal drugs. Until now, the
department had no written exception for medical marijuana. This has led many
patients to distrust their doctors, veterans say. With doctors and patients
pressing the veterans department for formal guidance, agency officials began
drafting a policy last fall.
“When states start legalizing marijuana we are put in a bit of
a unique position because as a federal agency, we are beholden to federal law,”
said Dr. Robert Jesse, the principal deputy under secretary for health in the
veterans department. At the same time, Dr. Jesse said, “We didn’t want patients
who were legally using marijuana to be administratively denied access to pain
management programs.” -- New York Times: Jul 2010
§ Another argument for legalizing drugs? Mexico now joins
Colombia and Afghanistan as a country whose very existence is threatened
by organized drug cartels. Another reason to conclude that the pluses
and minuses of legalization would be better in many ways than the pluses
and minuses of the stupid, costly, deadly, ineffective "war on drugs."
An argument against legalizing drugs? Comparing
drugs to alcohol makes no sense. Drinking alcohol has been part of
western civilization forever. Wine is imbedded in the culture "going
back to the Odyssey and the Torah." Marijuana, heroin, and cocaine
"do not share this distinguished pedigree. . . . Most people who
drink alcohol don't drink it to get drunk. In contrast, everyone who
smokes marijuana or crack does so to get high."
Rebuttal? So what? An individual should have
the right to get drunk or high. If he harms someone or
destroys property while drunk or high, his "diminished capacity"
should in no way diminish his responsibility.
Legalize Drugs: Argument Nbr. . . .
Mexico's drug-related violence has generated everything from blame to shame
and the usual call for being yet more aggressive in the "war on drugs."
Simultaneously, we are hearing more from the proponents of legalizing, or at
least decriminalizing the sale and use of drugs. Joining the legalization
cause is Jeffrey A. Miron, identified as "senior lecturer in economics at
Harvard University." Extracts from his piece to CNN.com:
Escalation, more troops and police, is "the wrong response;
drug prohibition is the cause of the violence." . . . " Violence was common
in the alcohol industry when it was barred during Prohibition, but not
before or after." . . . "Violence is the norm in illicit gambling markets
but not in legal ones." . . . Violence is routine where prostitution is
banned but not when it's permitted." . . . "Prohibition has disastrous
implications for national security. By eradicating coca plants in Colombia
or poppy fields in Afghanistan, prohibition breeds resentment of the United
States. . . . "The right policy is to legalize drugs while using regulation
and taxation to dampen irresponsible behavior . . . such as driving under
the influence."
Legalize Drugs, some police officials
agree
"Anyone concerned about the failure of our $69 billion-a-year War on Drugs
should watch this 12-minute program," Walter Cronkite is
quoted as saying, by Common Sense for Drug Policy. As has VersagiVoice,
the anti-War on Drugs movement compares the agony and cost of that war to the
unsuccessful Prohibition of alcohol. See Legalize Drugs
The 12-minute video quoting law enforcement
officials is available at www.leap.cc. The
website address for Common Sense is www.CSDP.org
Drug Czar?
Please. Decriminalize drugs instead
I certainly will vote for Chuck Semchena for county commissioner,
but I am disappointed to read that this Republican wants to add another
layer of government in the guise of a drug czar. Heroin overdoses, fatal
or not, make good scare tactics but that's no different from irresponsible
or fatal behavior caused by alcoholic drunkenness. The solution isn't to
invest even further in the stupid decades-long "war on drugs."
The solution is to decriminalize, or even legitimize drugs -- then hold
each individual responsible for her behavior -- by refusing to recognize
self-induced "diminished capacity" as a mitigating factor for
harmful activities. -- 20 Sep 06
2,000 cops
work to end unsuccessful drug war
"This country is long overdue in recognizing that not only have we lost the
war on drugs, but we have squandered billions of dollars and untold numbers of
lives," states a spokesman for the 2,000 members of Law Enforcement Against
Prohibition. Considering the war "futile," the group seems to opt for regulation of
distribution of illegal substances and "treatment instead of prison"
for drug addicts. 09 Nov 05
Michigan no longer allows
alcohol intoxication as an excuse
The last paragraph in the
brief essay above stresses the need to make it impossible for anyone to plead
diminished capacity as an extenuating circumstance after having committed a
crime. In September 2002, the State of Michigan closed a legal loophole which
had made it possible to use voluntary intoxication "as a defense in
cases of murder, child abuse, armed robbery, larceny, breaking and entering, and
assault," according to a report in the Oakland Press. Republican
State Rep. Ruth Johnson, who sponsored the legislation, said the new law
is a common sense measure based on "taking personal responsibility for
one's actions."
Oakland County
Prosecutor David Gorcyca added, "Defendants can no longer say, 'I
had too much to drink ... I didn't mean it.'"
Canada moves to
legalize marijuana
Movement is underway in Canada to treat pot as alcohol is treated: regulate
it, discourage its use, but decriminalize its use.
Michigan eases
overly severe drug penalties
Michigan has long had one of the most draconian laws in the country --
life sentences or 20-years in prison for simple possession of certain amounts,
even without evidence that the user had committed any other drug crimes. As his
term ended, Governor Engler signed legislation easing some of those penalties
'Should we
Re-Legalize Drugs?' is
the challenging opening question in a brochure on the website of the Libertarian
Party. Recalling that "cocaine was even found in the original Coca Cola
recipe," the site points out that at one time drugs like cocaine, heroin,
opium, and marijuana "were inexpensive, crime was low." Repeating the
point made in the last paragraph of the essay at the top of this page, the
Libertarian documents suggests, "It's time to re-legalize drugs and let
people take responsibility for themselves.
"Drug abuse is
a tragedy and a sickness," the article continues. "Criminal laws only
drive the problem underground and put money in the pockets of the criminal
class.
Prohibition
didn't work with alcohol. It obviously isn't working with drugs. I welcome
Ferndale's attempt to legalize the medical use of marijuana as a first stop
toward decriminalizing drug use -- so long as as "being
under the influence" -- of anything -- is never accepted as an excuse
for other illegal behavior. -- 20 Sep 05
During
Royal Oak's budget debates "quality of life" has become a mantra, a
copout. The implication is that any cut in city services will lead to the end of
civilization as we know it. Nonsense. City government needs not to "do more with
less," but to "do less." I will elaborate, even pontificate!
in the weeks to come, by becoming a pretend-candidate for city commissioner.
-- FJV: 25 Sep 05
Colorado resort
puts pot on ballot
Telluride, Colo, a city
catering "to moneyed hippies," realizes it can't legalize marijuana,
so it is asking voters to approve a ballot issue which will "officially
declare possession of pot for personal use" to be the town's "lowest
law enforcement priority." -- Detroit News: 02 Oct 05
French-based
study group suggests licensing opium as a painkiller
Arguing that poor countries do not have
adequate access to pain-reducing drugs a French-based study group operating in Afghanistan
proposes to license opium production as a pharmaceutical painkiller. Such a use
for the country's now illegal poppy production would benefit both those in pain
and Afghanistan's economy, the Sensil Council contends. -- The Economist: 08
Oct 05
Another argument
for decriminalizing drugs?
Newly elected president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, has pledged to legalize the
planting of coca in his country, while pledging to continue in the fight against
drug-trafficking. Bolivians chew coca leaves for mild pleasure and the largely
Indian population manifests no harmful addictive behavior.
Another argument for decriminalizing
drugs?
Retired
Police Detective says, 'Legalize Pot."
[Letter published in 09 Jan 2009 Detroit News]
As a retired Bath Township police detective, I can tell you that a lot of street
cops are happy not to be chasing citizens who need marijuana as a medicine. If
the voters would like to make street cops even happier, legalize or regulate and
tax marijuana. Then we could get back to the business of catching bad guys, not
someone smoking in their own home. -- Howard J. Wooldridge,
Laingsburg [Check him out at www.ask.com.]
|
VersagiVoice has long proposed
legalizing drugs. Whatever your preference, you can see arguments
for and against legalization by visiting several dedicated` websites:
www.CommonSenseDrugPolicy.org . . .
www.DrugWarFacts.org . . .
www.ManagingChronicPain.org
. . . www.MedicalMJ.org . . .
www.TreatingDrugAddiction.org.
http://www.rollitup.org
Legalize Prostitution too?
On this page
Bolivia
legalizes planting coca.
French-based
study group suggests licensing opium as a painkiller
Colorado resort
puts pot on ballot
Prohibition
didn't work with alcohol.
Should we Re-Legalize Drugs?'
cocaine in Coca Cola
Michigan eases
overly severe drug penalties
Canada moves to
legalize marijuana
Michigan no longer allows
alcohol intoxication as an excuse
Legalize
Prostitution?
Worldwide
there has been more
experimentation with
legalizing prostitution
than with legalizing
drugs. The results so
far are interesting,
even funny despite the
serious moral dimension
which pervades the
issue. Examples:
-
In
Great Britain
prostitution is
legal but eight of
ten prostitutes are
immigrants who are
experiencing a
worrisome rate of
rape. The country is
trying the approach
of lodging criminal
charges against any
John who pays a
prostitute who is
later found to be
"controlled for
another person's
gain." How this
protects a foreigner
who is unlikely to
know where to seek
help if being forced
into the sex trade
against her will
isn't clear, so
opponents of this
approach contend the
nation should either
re-criminalize
prostitution or do a
better job of
regulating and
policing the trade.
-
In
Hong Kong where
it is illegal for
anyone but the
prostitute to profit
from her services,
the problem is that
the law seems to
prohibit her from
hiring protection
for herself. Nor can
she share her
quarters with other
women. This is a
matter of concern
because of an
increase in violence
against prostitutes.
Hong Kong sentenced
a website owner to
18 months in jail
for carrying
advertising for
prostitutes ("living
off the
earnings of a
prostitute"). That
raised concern that
the law makes guilty
a doctor who treats
a prostitute,
landlords, and
newspapers which
carry solicitations
for a trade which is
legal.
-
The
Netherlands
legalized
prostitution eight
years ago, hoping to
rid the trade of
smuggling and money
laundering, hoping
also that the
state would need
only regulate the
trade and collect
taxes. Today, "the
link between
prostitution and
organized crime has
proved durable."
Police who patrol
Amsterdam's
red-light district
estimate that half
of the women posing
in the windows are
there against their
will.
-
During the four
years since
Sweden began
fining, imprisoning,
and publicly shaming
the men who pay for
sex with someone who
has been forced into
prostitution or is
controlled for
another's gain, the
number of
streetwalking
prostitutes has
dropped 40%. This
seems to be the
result of reducing
drive-by encounters.
-
Scotland has
also begun banning
curb-crawling, as
Sweden has.
For those
readers who are on
principle against
legalizing prostitution,
there are enough
negatives associated
with legalization to
confirm the correctness
of their belief. For
those who favor
legalization, the
negatives are neither as
numerous nor as serious
as the tragedies and
crimes which with
prohibition.
And the
experiments described
above provides
ammunition for both side
in the debate over
legalizing drugs.
-- April
2009
See
Legalize Drugs
08 Aug 2011
The War on Drugs is stupid.
Enforcement of Michigan's mish-mash of laws re marijuana is
stupider. (Ungrammatical, but the word fits here.)
Stupidity is described as repeating
over and over an activity which never succeeds -- hoping for a
miracle, I guess.
The Global Commission on Drug Policy says:
"Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to
articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: That
the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies
will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not,
and cannot, be won."
Tell me where the fight against pot
has succeeded. Prove to me that pot-smokers have committed a rash
of horrible crimes. (Getting arrested for violating stupid anti-drug
laws doesn't count.)
And new substances are "abused" every
3.7 years. Something called "oxy" is currently in the news.
For the record, I am too vain ever to
have felt the need to enhance my emotional or intellectual state
with any drug, unless you count a glass of wine
with dinner. (Even here, there's a stupid law which forbids parents allowing their kids to
have alcohol -- with or without a meal -- in their own home.
Millions of European-American families break that law every day.)
In Royal Oak or Rome, in Troy or
Tokyo, the War on Drugs is stupid.
'
|