The world is coming to an end -- again
Pat Buchanan's take on all this Also see: Health & Safety and Environment The media are daily filled with doom-and-gloom speculations. Here -- in support of those who are not congenital pessimists -- we include expressions of reasonable doubt and of optimism. Vanity Fair, Outdoor, Newsweek, Domino, all magazines that have Eco or Green issues. NO ONE who is a scientist denies global warming. If you look at who starved to death since 1970 you will see many people did, just not all over the planet. The flooding has started which is a precursor of the environmental damage. Water wars are on the way and some have begun all ready. What would be the purpose to pretend these things do not exist? I can not believe it would be because you do not care what happens to the less fortunate as that is who will suffer the most. Picking sensationalist remarks will assist no one except those who are just trying to score points. Points have never aided the world in any century. -- Lori Broesamle Frank, have you seen the BBC's Great Global Warming Swindle? It can be accessed at: http://www.archive.org/details/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle_Documentary. It's 77 minutes, so grab a cocktail and sit back for some eye opening "the other side of the story" take on things. This to me is a lot more bright and cheerful...but of course doesn't sell papers, get politicians elected or fund research as well as doom and gloom does, nor perpetuates the anti-capitalist/global economy thing that the far left fanatics love to bash. -- Kevin Konczal
But nobody lives there § Early Global Warming? Natural ice, cut from New England ponds was covered in sawdust and shipped as far as to Martinique. However, during "the exceptionally warm winter of 1818," suppliers were forced to hack at Labrador icebergs to supply their customers. § Early global warming? § Making ethanol from sugar cane, a la Brazil, is much more environmentally friendly and cost-effective than making it from corn. By going the corn-route, the U.S. is raising corn prices worldwide, hurting, not helping those who must pay the price of "converting food into fuel," suggests Fidel Castro -- and others who usually disagree with the Cuban dictator. § They continually say we only have 10 years left, and they've been saying it for 20 years, and it's ridiculous." -- Tom Harris, Natural Resources Stewarding Project, Ottawa § Changes in the brightness of the sun are almost certainly the primary cause of the warming trend since the end of the "Little Ice Age" of the late 19th century . . . Human emissions of carbon dioxide appear to have little effect on the global climate. -- Tim Patterson, science professor at Carleton University, Ottawa § "Biofuels face a great deal of criticism. Food commodities such as corn, canola and soy all yield oil, but they are expensive, require intensive agriculture practices and threaten food supplies." -- Scientific American, June 2007 § "Human-induced climate and hydrological change is likely to make many parts of the world uninhabitable, or at least uneconomic. Over the course of a few decades, if not sooner, hundreds of millions of people may be compelled to relocate because of environmental pressures." -- Jeffrey D. Sachs, Earth Institute at Columbia University
§ Early global warming? § "Biofuels face a great deal of criticism. Food commodities such as corn, canola and soy all yield oil, but they are expensive, require intensive agriculture practices and threaten food supplies." -- Scientific American, June 2007 § Those who like to scare the world about global warming -- oops, about climate change -- will find a treasure in the August 2007 issue of Scientific American. In total support of the world-is-coming-to-an-end advocates, the journal -- using great text and graphics and layout -- even regionalizes the scares by continent. Anyone who isn't aware that there is authoritative international disagreement about all this will come away from this one-sided report thoroughly frightened. |
§ Early global warming?
In 1854, the winter being unusually dry, the level of Swiss lakes sank, and
revealed [ruins of prehistoric lake-dwellers]. -- Our Oriental Heritage,
by Will Durant.
§ Why bees are disappearing
Ian Lipkin of Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health suspects
that a virus is the cause of "colony collapse disorder" for the second year in a
row. He suspects the pathogen entered the U.S. on imported bees. Impossible.
Everybody knows that global warming is causing the population drop in bees.
§ Real world gets in the way . . . again
"The plan to install solar roofs on houses has been stymied by the high cost
of photovoltaic panels, red tape, and a requirement, temporarily suspended, that
customers buy additional power at rates that vary according to demand. That
would have increase some households' energy bills."
-- Environmental study in California
§ Lighting accounts for some 19% of the world's use of electricity. A standard incandescent bulb costs, say, $1 and uses $15 of electricity a year. A low-energy fluorescent bulb costs $5-6 and uses $3 worth of electricity, so the payback for going with energy-efficient bulbs is less than a year. Yet sales of such bulbs is growing substantially only in the developing world, where the cost of electricity is much higher than in the rich world.
§ If solar power is the answer, why isn't it being used throughout Africa?
In pictures taken at night from Space, one can identify lighted Italy, Spain,
France, the UK, Except for Egypt and South Africa, the picture of Africa is that
of, actually, a Dark Continent. Africa has a few hydroelectric plants and some
imported backup generators to generate electricity, not nearly enough to enable
development of the continent. Some hope that if the cost for solar generation
drops by at least 30%, it might become justifiable to go that route to light up
the Dark Continent.
§ There's no connection between global warming and stormy weather, according to an authority who has been issuing Atlantic basin hurricane forecasts for 24 years. Citing hurricane frequency and severity during several 50-year blocks, William M Gray, professor emeritus in the Department of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University and research fellow at the Independent Institute, ties hurricanes to naturally occurring variations in the flow of warm and cold salty water in the Atlantic Ocean. Gray suggests that greenhouse gas theorists tend to be "climate modelers with little observational experience. Many of the modelers are not fully aware of how the real atmosphere and ocean function. They rely more on theory than on observation." -- Wall Street Journal 25 July 007
Yes there is, insist a couple of atmospheric scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, in Boulder, Colorado. Greg Holland and Peter Webster maintain that the number of Atlantic hurricanes "tracks the increase in sea surface temperature related to climate change." Not surprisingly, Holland's and Webster's conclusions are presented in that strongly biased scholarly publication, ScientificAmerican.com..
§ "Environmentalism -- unlike scientific ecology -- does not belong to the natural sciences and can be classified as ideology. . . . Environmentalists' argumentation is based not on simple empirical measurements or laboratory experiments but on sophisticated model experiments working with a range of ill-founded assumptions that are usually hidden and not sufficiently understood." -- Václav Klaus, former president of the Czech Republic
§ Among some recent recreational reading, I perused books dealing with Babylonia, Early Israel, and Aztec & Maya history. Each of them, in speculating about the reasons for mass migrations and wars includes the impact of climate change. Formerly fruitful land becomes barren. Rivers dry up or flood. Average temperatures rise or fall for years at a time or permanently. Drastic change in regional flora and fauna. All this thousands of years ago, before Exxon and GM began to poison the earth and contribute to global warming.
§ "Every year, up to 30,000 species disappear due to human activity alone. At this rate, we could lose half of Earth's species in this century." -- The New Republic, 24 Sep 2007.
REALLY? Who counts those 30,000 species? How do they count them? Another, false, statistical scare from a publication which contains excellent writing but is also known for publishing questionable information. A recent example was false testimony by a, non-existent?, Iraq War veteran.
§
Let's see, now.
Scare-mongers assured us
that global warming caused Katrina and that
hurricanes henceforth will be more numerous and more deadly than ever before.
What followed, though, has been two successive seasons with fewer and milder
hurricanes than predicted. Oh, well.
-- 12 Dec 07
§ About global warming -- "climate change" if you prefer -- the challenges continue to come to what some critics call "Gore's mythical consensus." A piece in Investor's Business Daily* quotes sources like the Danish Meteorological Institute and Canada's National Research Council, and the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research, in Germany, all of which contend it is what happens on the sun, not in "tailpipes and smokestacks", which affects the earth. Excerpts:
□ Data going back "centuries" show "global temperatures tracked solar cycles."
□ The long-tracked 11-year cycle in solar activity, sunspots in particular, seems "disturbingly quiet" and this "lack of increased activity could signal the beginning of what is known as a Maunder Minimum, an event which occurs every couple of centuries and can last as long as a century."
□ A 17th century Maunder Minimum corresponded with a "period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted, with intermittent spikes of warming, until 1715." Frigid winters and cold summers led to massive crop failures and famine in Northern Europe.
□ The sun "has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years, accounting for a 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature over the last 100 years.
□ "Try as we might, we simply could not find any relationship between industrial activity, energy consumption and changes in global temperatures."
* "The Sun Also Sets" -- 07 Feb 2008 posting
Coal, gas, wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, biofuels,
nuclear --
All right already!
Finally, an almost unbiased look at energy options. Except that he tells you why he
prefers nuclear, veteran journalist William Tucker provides an objective
overview of energy options in a lecture to a Hillsdale College conference.
Highlights from a report in the college's publication, Imprimis.
The U.S. currently gets 50% of its electricity from coal and 20% from nuclear reactors. Reversing these percentages should become a goal of both global warming advocates and anyone who wants to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.
103 nuclear reactors are operating in America. The entire fleet is up and running 90% of the time.
Coal is the most environmentally destructive substance ever utilized. The EPA estimates that coal kills 30,000 Americans each year through lung diseases -- and China is much worse.
Oil accounts for 40% of our nation's energy consumption and is perhaps the most difficult to replace.
Natural gas is considered the most environmentally benign fossil fuel. Using it to produce electricity has resulted in a price crunch and the loss of gas-dependent industries, like fertilizer and plastic factories. We are importing 15% of our gas consumption from Canada.
The term "renewable" is misleading. no energy is renewable. The term really describes "tapping flows of solar energy which are supposedly free. But coal and oil in the ground are also free. It just takes work -- and energy -- to recover them."
So, too, renewables can only be gathered at a cost.
Hydroelectricity is a form of solar energy. The sun evaporates water, which falls as rain and then flows back to the sea, creating kinetic energy. Rivers have been tapped from Roman times. Hydroelectric dams provided 30% of our electricity in the 1930s, but the figure is now 10%.
The problem with wind as a renewable source is that it is unpredictable. Wind irregularities can be masked up to 20%, but after that it becomes too disruptive. Windmills are large. The biggest stands 65 stories tall and produces only six megawatts -- about 1/200th of a conventional power plant.
Solar energy is very diffuse. A 36-inch square card table receives enough sunlight to run only four 100-wat electric bulbs. Gathering and storing solar energy requires vast land areas. In the 1980s, California built a Power Tower that focused hundreds of mirrors on a single point to boil water to drive a turbine. The facility covered one-fifth of a square mile and produced ten megawatts. It was shut down. An installation the size of half a football field could power one suburban home -- when the sun is shining. It would cost about $35,000 to provide one-quarter of an average home's electricity.
Geothermal energy -- from the natural heat of the earth in contact with ground water -- produces geysers and steam leaks which can be used to produce electricity.
Nuclear:
Consider that an average 1,000 megawatt coal plant requires a train with 110
loaded railroad cars, each loaded with 20 tons of coal, every five days. Each
carload will provide 20 minutes of electricity. When burned, each ton of coal
will throw three tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere -- amounting to
40% of greenhouse gases and 20% of the world's carbon emissions. In contrast,
a 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor receives a fleet of flatbed trucks to deliver
fuel rods -- every two years.
There is no way for a nuclear reactor to explode, although it can melt down, as happened at Three Mile Island. The melted fuel stayed within the reactor vessel. The only radioactive debris was a puff of steam that emitted the same radiation as a single chest x-ray. ... In Russia's Chernobyl accident, it was Russian design which failed to contain the problem. More radioactive fallout fell on Harrisburg, Pennsylvania from Chernobyl than from Three Mile Island.
France has produced 80% of its electricity with nuclear power for 25 years. It is time to avail ourselves on this clean, safe "terrestrial" energy.
Nuclear waste is not the overwhelming problem some claim. A spent fuel rod is 95% U-238. "The is the same material we find in a shovel full of dirt from our own back yards. Of the remaining 5%, most is useful, but small amounts should probably be placed in a repository such as Yucca Mountain. The useful parts -- uranium-235 and plutonium -- can be recycled as fuel."
§ "Perhaps ethanol just isn't as bio-friendly as it looks. . . . Some say the production process uses almost as much energy as it produces." -- The Economist
Nothing
is perfect
There are about 13,000 facilities around the world that convert seawater
into drinkable water, half of them in the Middle East. Oceans offer an
unending raw material for strategically located new desalination plants.
Desalination, though, uses a lot of energy and can cost several times as
much as treating groundwater or river water, and now the technology exists
to begin lowering the cost. To overcome objections from
environmentalists worried about greenhouse gases generated by desalination
plants, developers are locating, for example, near wind farms. And some
lessons provided by conventional industries, like evaporative techniques
used in sugar refining, are being used.
-- 02 Jul 08
The global warming debate
gets personal.
Czech President Vaclav Klaus -- whom Al Gore refuses to debate --
insists
that global warming is being championed by scientists and other
environmentalists whose careers and funding require selling the public on
global warming. -- 09 Jul 08
Global Warming Preview
"Around 7000BC, temperatures rose worldwide and in Central America many
grassland areas gave way either to desert or to tropical jungle. Animals
were fewer and hunting became more difficult, so people turned to more
intensive food cultivation."
-- Aztec & Maya Illustrated Encyclopedia
Global Warming Before Christ
Discovery of artifacts in Africa has led to reports which include: "About
100 million years ago, [the Sahara desert] was forested and occupied by
dinosaurs and enormous crocodiles. . . .By 50,000 years ago, people moved in.
. . . The lakes dried up in the last Ice Age. . . . The rains and lakes
of a fecund Sahara returned some 12,000 years ago, and remained, except for
one 1,000-year interval, until about 4,500 years ago. Geologists have long
known that the region's basins retained mineral residue of former lakes . .
. "
Then the Sahara again became desert, as it is today -- caused by man-made global warming, you know.
"France sticks with nuclear power,"
is the headline on an International Herald Tribune piece. Currently, nuclear power supplies 77% of France's electricity, according to the newspaper, which adds, " . . . in a country with little coal, oil or natural gas." There have been minor accidents, like leaking pipes, but not enough to change French policy or to prevent erecting new nuclear plants.France generates its 77% of electricity with "58 operating nuclear reactors." The U.S.'s 104 nuclear plants, generate less than 20% of our electrical power.
|
§ France is reported to be asking the European Union to give carmakers "far more time" to adapt to new limits on greenhouse gas emissions. The hope is to ease the pressure on those manufacturers, especially in Germany, which make heavier cars.
§ Boston (MA) - Scientists at MIT have recorded a nearly simultaneous world-wide increase in methane levels. This is the first increase in ten years, and what baffles science is that this data contradicts theories stating man is the primary source of increase for this greenhouse gas. It takes about one full year for gases generated in the highly industrial northern hemisphere to cycle through and reach the southern hemisphere. However, since all worldwide levels rose simultaneously throughout the same year, it is now believed this may be part of a natural cycle in mother nature - and not the direct result of man's contributions. -- 30 Oct 08
§ "The environmentalists, a leading British scientist charges, may be the most insidious of all plunderers of our planet. Using 'a technique of calculated overdramatization,' they have deflected attention from the genuine ecological issues we face and blinded us to solutions that exists now." -- book report re The Doomsday Syndrome, published in "Saturday Review" of 21 October 1972. -- Nov 2008
§ "I do not know of any environmental group in any country that does not view its government as an adversary." -- Gro Harlem Brundtland, former Prime Minister of Norway
§ The reasoned case for or against ethanol as a transportation fuel offers insight which escapes those who are wont to assign derogatory labels to their opponents. Consider the thoughtful, if conflicting, positions:
Brazil is a world leader in providing ethanol, as well as biodiesel, and the country is held up as an example by anything-but-oil advocates. Brazil derives its ethanol from sugar cane and its biodiesel from oil seeds, like soybeans, palm nuts, and castor beans.
America has focused mostly on corn as its source of ethanol. Two results: the price of corn continues to rise and corn as food -- for humans and animals -- becomes in short supply.
America's ethanol is priced higher than is Brazil's, and its price is protected by high tariffs on sugar cane-produced ethanol.
Biofuels are attacked by environmentalists, who blame the alternative fuels for tropical deforestation as land is converted to pastureland or brought into cultivation.
Feelings aside, it is obvious that there can be thoughtful arguments to suggest that using to plants instead of oil as a fuel is not automatically the right thing to do. Realistic choices arise, like drill for oil or threaten forests. It is understandable that different countries will make different choices, with no choice being without doubt the superior one.
Efforts to support
global climate-change falls: Poll
PARIS - There is both growing public reluctance to make personal sacrifices
and a distinct lack of enthusiasm for the major international efforts now
underway to battle climate change, according to findings of a poll of 12,000
citizens in 11 countries, including Canada.
Results of the poll were released this week in advance of the start of a major international conference in Poland where delegates are considering steps toward a new international climate-change treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. -- November 27, 2008: Peter O'Neil, Europe Correspondent, Canwest News Service
"As the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, an economist, anti-totalitarian and climate change sceptic, prepares to take up the rotating presidency of the European Union next year, climate alarmists are doing their best to traduce him. The New York Times opened a profile of Klaus, 67, this week with a quote from a 1980s communist secret agent's report, claiming he behaves like a "rejected genius", and asserts there is "palpable fear" he will "embarrass" the EU.
"But the real fear driving climate alarmists wild is that a more rational approach to the fundamentalist religion of global warming may be in the ascendancy - whether in the parliamentary offices of the world's largest trading bloc or in the living rooms of Blacktown.
As the global financial crisis takes hold, perhaps people are starting to wonder whether the so-called precautionary principle, which would have us accept enormous new taxes in the guise of an emissions trading scheme and curtail economic growth, is justified, based on what we actually know about
§ Let's see: Earth had global cooling, ice ages, before the Industrial Revolution. Centuries ago, the Green Crescent went dry and brown. Forests have become deserts. Now, faced with increasing evidence that the earth is cooling, climate control alarmists are claiming that man-made global warming is causing global cooling. Very scientific, what?
New Ice Age to last 100,000 years
The earth is now on the brink of entering another Ice Age, according to a large
and compelling body of evidence from within the field of climate science. Many
sources of data which provide our knowledge base of long-term climate change
indicate that the warm, twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather
soon be coming to an end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age conditions
for the next 100,000 years. --
http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922-earth_ice_age-0
| The Economy . . . 85% Terrorism . . . 76% Health Insurance . . . 52% |
Helping the Poor . . . 50% Immigration . . 41% Global Warming . . . 30% |
And, first-year blues have already affected a handful of wind farms around the world.